Discussion about this post

User's avatar
J'accuse's avatar

Thank you so much for your documentation of this and other instances of despicable behavior from our institutions.

I read the statement that part of the reason they wanted the ADL banned was because they criticized BLM. So let me understand this logic, they say that the ADL tries to curtail criticism of Jews at the same time they are making clear they are banning the ADL because they sometimes criticize black hate groups?

The ADL is no more guilty of the things it's accused of than the NAACP, The Urban League and various illegal immigration lobby groups. It is less guilty of these things than CAIR and BLM.

In Seattle the public schools have partnered with both BLM and the NAACP. If the ADL is excluded then all of these groups need to be excluded also. I see a valid lawsuit in the works if this doesn't happen.

I do not care how many Jews come forward okaying these double standards. They need to treat Jews equally. And they have done an enormously great job in my region, the Pacific Northwest, of silencing any voices speaking out about anti-Semitism when it's coming from or on behalf of the black or Muslim community. Yet these groups are allowed to speak freely without being shut down.

There is no pro Jewish group allowed a voice. Any group that is not 100% pro-black, pro-Muslim and pro-legal immigration is also not allowed a voice.

Thank you for your work and please continue to document these things. We need to keep the receipts.

Expand full comment
Josh Joshua's avatar

Notice how there were no "boos and jeers" from the crowd, which the writers here lie about in the previous article. I was there, I listened to the debate. It is an outright LIE to say the people speaking in opposition to this NBI were "jeered and booed". It was a razor thin vote, with many people abstaining.

Don't be radicalized by lies. What you're reading here is not an accurate portrayal of what actually took place at the RA.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts